Bill Type
Congress Name
Long Title
AN ACT GRANTING THE MAGNA CARTA FOR DAY CARE WORKERS, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Date filed
February 5, 2002
Scope
Urgent Bill
No
Legislative History
| House Bill/Resolution NO. House Bill No. 4348, 12th Congress of the Republic | |
| FULL TITLE : AN ACT GRANTING THE MAGNA CARTA FOR DAY CARE WORKERS, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES | |
| ABSTRACT : Rationale: There is no law that protects the interests of one of our most important service providers. Until now Day Care Workers are only receiving a meager monthly allowance of P500 as provided for by Republic Act 6972 or the Day Care Law, a measure that rationalize the establishment of Day Care Centers in every barangay. Aside from the economic conditions that they are subjected to, Day Care Workers have no security of tenure and their appointments are in many cases subject to the whims of politicians. This is why the state should guarantee the security of tenure for these workers. | |
| PRINCIPAL AUTHOR/S : BIAZON, ROZZANO RUFINO B. | |
| DATE FILED : 2002-02-05 | |
| SIGNIFICANCE: NATIONAL | |
| CO-AUTHORS : | |
| 1. Albano | 2. Amante |
| 3. Amatong | 4. Ancheta |
| 5. Apostol | 6. Arbison |
| 7. Bacani | 8. Baculio |
| 9. Badelles | 10. Baterina |
| 11. Bersamin | 12. Bulut |
| 13. Carloto | 14. Celeste |
| 15. De Guzman | 16. Enrile |
| 17. Escudero | 18. Espinosa |
| 19. Espinosa | 20. Gullas |
| 21. Jala | 22. Matalam |
| 23. Nieva | 24. Perez |
| 25. Remulla | 26. Rodriguez |
| 27. Singson | 28. Soon-ruiz |
| 29. Suplico | 30. Tulagan |
| 31. Villareal | 32. Yapha |
| 33. Ylagan | |
| CO-AUTHORS (Journal Entries) : | |
| 1. Chatto (066 ) | 2. Villarama (088 ) |
| 3. Lapus (088 ) | 4. Zialcita (088 ) |
| 5. Dy (092 ) | 6. Saludo (092 ) |
| 7. Ramiro (093 ) | 8. Castro (094 ) |
| 9. Jaraula (094 ) | 10. Rosales (094 ) |
| 11. Reyes (002 ) | 12. Real (004 ) |
| 13. Espinosa (013 ) | 14. Roco (019 ) |
| 15. Pingoy (020 ) | 16. Estrella (020 ) |
| 17. Solis (020 ) | 18. Pablo (020 ) |
| 19. Alvarez (020 ) | 20. Abad (020 ) |
| 21. Cagas (020 ) | 22. Umali (020 ) |
| 23. Mathay (020 ) | 24. Ipong (020 ) |
| 25. Alfelor (020 ) | 26. Banaag (020 ) |
| 27. Villar (019 ) | 28. Silverio (022 ) |
| 29. Torres (022 ) | 30. Montilla (022 ) |
| 31. Joaquin (022 ) | 32. Suarez (022 ) |
| 33. Jaafar (022 ) | 34. Aquino (022 ) |
| 35. Vicencio (022 ) | 36. Gozos (022 ) |
| 37. Chipeco (022 ) | 38. Ecleo (023 ) |
| 39. Rodriguez (023 ) | 40. Uy (024 ) |
| 41. Dadivas (025 ) | 42. Malanyaon (025 ) |
| 43. Dilangalen (025 ) | 44. Taliño-santos (025 ) |
| 45. Defensor (025 ) | 46. Cojuangco (025 ) |
| 47. Martinez (025 ) | 48. Imperial (025 ) |
| 49. Puentebella (025 ) | 50. Clarete (026 ) |
| 51. Santiago (026 ) | 52. Del Mar (026 ) |
| 53. Ocampo (026 ) | 54. Bueser (027 ) |
| 55. Echiverri (027 ) | 56. Cari (028 ) |
| 57. Aquino (028 ) | 58. Failon (028 ) |
| 59. Macarambon (028 ) | 60. Lozada (028 ) |
| 61. San Juan (028 ) | 62. Chiongbian (028 ) |
| 63. Ortega (029 ) | 64. Nograles (029 ) |
| 65. Nantes (032 ) | 66. Wacnang (032 ) |
| 67. Violago (032 ) | 68. Ledesma (035 ) |
| 69. Nicolas (044 ) | 70. Gatchalian (046 ) |
| 71. Taganas Layus (049 ) | 72. Angping (050 ) |
| 73. Olano (059 ) | 74. Syjuco (059 ) |
| 75. Locsin (021 ) | 76. Romualdo (070 ) |
| 77. Marcos (076 ) | 78. Ermita-buhain (002 ) |
| 79. Lagman-luistro (002 ) | 80. Mitra (004 ) |
| 81. Duavit (007 ) | 82. Floirendo (009 ) |
| 83. Espino (012 ) | 84. Monfort (023 ) |
| 85. Lacson (023 ) | |
| ADMINISTRATION BILL? No | |
| URGENT BILL? No | |
| ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE COMMITTEE ON RULES | |
| REFERRAL TO THE COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SERVICES ON 2002-02-11 | |
| SECONDARILY REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE(S) ON APPROPRIATIONS |
Abstract
Rationale: There is no law that protects the interests of one of our most important service providers. Until now Day Care Workers are only receiving a meager monthly allowance of P500 as provided for by Republic Act 6972 or the Day Care Law, a measure that rationalize the establishment of Day Care Centers in every barangay. Aside from the economic conditions that they are subjected to, Day Care Workers have no security of tenure and their appointments are in many cases subject to the whims of politicians. This is why the state should guarantee the security of tenure for these workers.
Disclaimer
Note: Legislative history and other information accessed from Congress Legis. Information as of April 20, 2022.