Bill Type
Long Title
AN ACT ABOLISHING THE PENALTIES CHARGED BY DEPOSITORY BANKS AGAINST DEPOSITS THAT FALL BELOW THE PRESCRIBED AVERAGE DAILY BALANCE
Date filed
June 5, 2000
Scope
Urgent Bill
No
Legislative History
House Bill/Resolution NO. HB11703 | |
FULL TITLE : AN ACT ABOLISHING THE PENALTIES CHARGED BY DEPOSITORY BANKS AGAINST DEPOSITS THAT FALL BELOW THE PRESCRIBED AVERAGE DAILY BALANCE | |
ABSTRACT : Rationale: The Supereme Court, in Tian Tiong Tick vs. American Apothecaries, rules that deposits of money in banks whether fixed, savings and current are really loans to a bank because the bank can use the same for its ordinary transactions and forthe banking business in which it is engaged. In the interest of justice and fair play, it is therefore just and proper to abolish such irrational charges. For, banks are regarded as borrowers under the law because Supreme Court decisions form part of the law of the land. | |
PRINCIPAL AUTHOR/S : PADILLA, CASIMIRO ROY JR. A. | |
DATE FILED : 2000-06-05 | |
SIGNIFICANCE: NATIONAL | |
CO-AUTHORS : | |
1. | 2. |
3. | 4. |
ADMINISTRATION BILL? No | |
URGENT BILL? No | |
ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE COMMITTEE ON RULES | |
REFERRAL TO THE COMMITTEE ON BANKS AND FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES ON 2000-07-17 |
Abstract
Rationale: The Supereme Court, in Tian Tiong Tick vs. American Apothecaries, rules that deposits of money in banks whether fixed, savings and current are really loans to a bank because the bank can use the same for its ordinary transactions and forthe banking business in which it is engaged. In the interest of justice and fair play, it is therefore just and proper to abolish such irrational charges. For, banks are regarded as borrowers under the law because Supreme Court decisions form part of the law of the land.
Disclaimer
Note: Legislative history and other information accessed from Congress Legis. Information as of April 20, 2022.